
In the 2009 General Assembly’s final business session, delegates rejected
Resolution 0925, "A Call for Action."
Speaking on behalf of the Standing Committee on Renewal and Structural Reform, Barbara Jones, regional minister of the Great River Region, addressed concerns from yesterday’s debate: "Public witness is now and becoming more and more a grassroots movement. 'Call for Action' is part of that movement."
Jones continued, "The difference between this document and what we had in past is ownership. Ownership now comes from the General Board, which is made up of congregational members now as well, so now there will be an interlinking of congregations, the regions, and the general church.
"Once items are selected, information will go out and there will be ample time for education prior to and at the Assembly for whatever is selected. That’s why we have fewer items. Many perspectives can be included.
"Let’s try it," she concluded. "We have an opportunity for change."
. . . [But] Charles Bayer, a retired minister from Claremont, CA . . . described the resolution as "basically anti-democratic." Congregations may exert considerable effort to draft impassioned, thoughtful, spirit-led resolutions that will never make it to the floor of the General Assembly, he said, "because the General Board and Office of the General Minister and President decide what gets to floor and who gets to debate."
Finally, argued Bayer, "Our resolutions (under this resolution) can’t speak to the world or the National Council (of Churches in the USA) where we stand on issues."
The standing vote failed to receive the required two-thirds majority, so Resolution 0925 was rejected. . . . Rejection of Resolution 0925 means the procedure for handling resolutions will continue as is.
To read the entire article from DisciplesWorld, PLEASE CLICK HERE.